Lawyer Louisiana Attorney & Lawyer - Choosing a Personal Injury Lawyer...

When you?ve been injured in an accident or at work you?ll want to find the best personal injury lawyer you can so that you can receive the funds for the medical care you?ll need. However, the process of choosing a personal injury lawyer may take a little time, especially if you?re not sure what you should be looking for in a personal injury lawyer.

Here are some suggestions that will help you to find just the right lawyer for you in a timely manner;

Before you settle on a lawyer, you should do some research to find out just how creditable the personal injury lawyer is, and how much experience he or she has. Many people simply search through the Yellow Pages to find a lawyer, thinking that the bigger the ad is, the more professional the lawyer will be. Of course, this is not necessarily true. One of the best ways to find out which personal injury lawyer is right for you is to talk to friends and family members that may have had a similar experience to yours, and have needed the services of a lawyer in the past. This way, you?ll know first-hand which law firms will be able to help you.

It?s also a great idea to get a background check on the lawyer(s) you?re considering hiring to handle your case. The background check should include credentials, state bar records, years of experience and verdicts and settlements, so that you?ll know how long the lawyer has been working, as well as how many cases the personal injury lawyer has won.

A personal injury attorney that can give you good advice and listen to your needs and requests is also ideal. While you do want a lawyer that is qualified to get you the compensation you deserve for your injuries, you also want to know that if you have any questions about the progress of the case, or want to handle the case in a certain way because of special circumstances, your lawyer will be understanding and willing to listen to what you have to say.

Making sure that your personal injury lawyer knows how to schedule and/or take on clients is another plus. When a lawyer makes sure that he or she does not have an overwhelming amount of cases to take on per day, you can be sure that your case is getting the attention it deserves. This can also be an indication that the lawyer?s ethics are intact; when he or she is willing to concentrate on each case separately, instead of hiding behind a big name or lots of paperwork when it comes to handling your case, this can be a sign that he or she is not afraid to be personable with you. A lawyer that takes the time to talk to you one-on-one about how the accident occurs, who is at fault, and what you are entitled to as far as compensation is concerned will definitely make you feel more at ease about winning the case.

If you need more information about hiring a personal injury lawyer in your area, you should talk to some of the attorneys at local firms in your area. This will give you a chance to informally interview some personal injury attorneys to get a feel for their professionalism and work ethic. You can also ask your employer about personal injury lawyers that may be affiliated with your company if you are injured whilst working, since you may be able to receive more compensation this way in some cases. Or, if you?ve been injured in a road accident or another type of accident, make sure that you select an attorney that can help you to determine what it is you?re entitled to as far as health insurance and medical coverage may be concerned.

It is important that you know exactly what you can expect from winning a case with a personal injury lawyer so make sure you are informed about how much money you can receive for your case based on the nature and severity of your injuries (i.e. if you are injured and can not work for an extended period of time).

For more tips on selecting a personal injury lawyer or to make a personal injury claim in the UK visit www.personal-injury-uk.com.

This article courtesy of http://www.mentzlaw.com.
You may freely read this information.

Recall Information about lawyer

* Government Statistics on Legal Verdicts and Jury Awards - $ U.S. district courts terminated approximately 512,000 civil cases during fiscal years 2002-03. Nearly 20% or 98,786 of these cases were torts in which plaintiffs claimed injury, loss, or damage from a defendant’s negligent or intentional acts. $ Of the 98,786 tort cases terminated in U.S. district courts in 2002-03, about 2% or 1,647 cases were decided by a bench or jury trial. $ An estimated 9 out of 10 tort trials involved personal injury issues C most frequently, product liability, motor vehicle (accident), marine, and medical malpractice cases. $ Juries decided about 71% of all tort cases brought to trial in U.S. district courts; judges adjudicated the remaining 29%. $ Plaintiffs won in 48% of tort trials terminated in U.S. district courts in 2002-03. Plaintiffs won less frequently in medical malpractice (37%) and product liability (34%) trials. $ Eighty-four percent of plaintiff winners received monetary damages with an estimated median award of $201,000. $ Plaintiffs won more often in bench (54%) than in jury (46%) tort trials. The estimated median damage awards were higher in jury ($244,000) than in bench ($150,000) tort trials. April 2006 - A Jury in New Jersey found last week that Vioxx significantly contributed to a 77-year-old man's heart attack awarded him $9 million in punitive damages yesterday, raising Merck & Co.'s liability in the case to $13.5 million and intensifying pressure on it to settle such lawsuits. Example of Personal Injury Case 2004 : Ford Explorer rollover-prone and roof not crash safe and worthy- CASE TYPE : Product Design Defect, Auto Truck Vehicle - SUV, Motor Vehicle – Rollover CASE : Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., San Diego Co., Calif., Super. Ct. GIC 800836 Los Angeles, Calif. JURY VERDICT: $369,000,000 (369 Millions Dolalrs 2005 - In what may be one of the biggest massive medical malpractice tort verdicts in the state of Texas, a state jury awarded $606 million - including a remarkable $ 600 million dollars in punitive damages - to the family of an 82-year-old patient who had cancer and then who died after receiving an overdose of chemotherapy drugs. 2005 - In the 9th big loss for Ford in SUV Explorer rollover cases, a Florida jury awarded $61.2 million to the parents of an 18-year-old boy who was killed in a 1997 (wrongful death & Product Defect and Product Liability Issues) Example of Personal Injury Lawyer Case 2004 : Dodge Caravan seatback collapsed on baby in a car-seat - CASE TYPE : Automobiles, Products Liability - Product Design Defect, Wrongful Death, Motor Vehicle - Rear-ender, Motor Vehicle - Passenger, Motor Vehicle - Minivan CASE : Flax v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., Davidson Co., Tenn., Cir. Ct. O2C-1288 JURY VERDICT : $105,500,000 (105 Million Dollars 2005 – Billion Dollar Verdicts - In one of 2005's largest verdicts to an individual plaintiff regarding financial fraud , a Florida jury ordered Morgan Stanley Broker Dealer to pay $1.45 billion to investor Ronald O. Perelman for defrauding him in the sale of his camping gear company - Coleman. 2005 - February, a prominent Houston law firm and a Texas bank were SMACKED and Beaten with a $65.5 million verdict in a highly complex estate planning case that involved major problems and conflicts of interest. (65 million dollar jury award) 2005 – 3 years after a jury acquitted a company in Florida of manslaughter and criminal charges, a Florida civil jury SLAMMED the outdoor advertiser with a $65 million jury award verdict for the shock and electrocution of a sixth-grade boy. Age Discrimination - In December, a Los Angeles California jury found that PrivatAir - an aviation company focusing on private airline services - wrongfully fired Captain Doyle D. Baker on the basis of his age, defaming him in the termination process and causing extreme emotional distress.

Punitive damages serve a number of important functions which—despite a few horror stories, which are themselves either apocryphal or overturned in the courts, the functions remain valid and in the public interest. Persons causing great harm—persons deliberately or with gross negligence causing great harm should not view paying damages as merely a cost of doing business, a cost that might fit neatly into a risk analysis of wrongdoing. That is what happened in the Ford Pinto case in which the cost of paying claims to victims of a known deadly hazard was deemed less than the cost to retool the assembly line, and thus the hazard was maintained knowing full well that further people—more people would be injured or killed. This is the purpose of punitive damages, to punish this kind of egregious wrongdoing, and to deter, to be a deterrent to such conduct. It is not immediately clear why a deterrent—or the necessity of the deterrent should bear any great relationship to the amount of actual damages in a given case. There is nothing wrong and indeed something highly desirable in maintaining this disincentive to wrongdoing in an appropriate relationship to the harm and the conduct of the tort-feasor. This trend has led one commentator to suggest that ''[p]unitive damages have replaced baseball as our national sport.'' Theodore B. Olson, Rule of Law: The Dangerous National Sport of Punitive Damages, Wall St. J., Oct. 5, 1994, at A17. See also Malcolm E. Wheeler, A Proposal for Further Common Law Development of the Use of Punitive Damages in Modern Products Liability Litigation, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 919, 919 (1989) (''Today, hardly a month goes by without a multimillion-dollar punitive damages verdict in a product liability case.'').